Finally, They Investigate These Sharia Courts

The Tory MPs admitted it; Sharia court investigations weren't part of the plan. I can recall a few years back, these Tories wanted to make UK a financial market for the Middle East and Arabian countries by inculcating Sharialaw-based Islamic financing. While not destructive, it has alarmed me that over time, Britain turns into an Islamic nation. That's where the money is anyway.

"Sharia Councils Working In a Discriminatory and Unacceptable Way". Duh.

If that wasn't obvious, I don't know what is. While we may hate Home Secretary Theresa May for her strict immigration policies to "protect Britain" of sorts, I could say her point of view regarding these Sharia courts to be on my side.

She believes the courts are being used against women. At the very least, the courts are unfair against women.

According to Lord Bates:

"Sharia councils may be working in a discriminatory and unacceptable way.

"That is why, as part of the forthcoming counter-extremism strategy, Government will commission a full, independent investigation to assess to what extent Sharia is being applied in a manner that is unacceptable."

Shams, Discrimination and Whatnot

Meanwhile, Sharia courts said they did not discriminate against women and had molded their form of Sharia within the British legal principles because they are advisors and not courts.

British Muslim women are being duped into sham Sharia marriages. You wouldn't believe what kind of hell awaits these British converts.

No, I'm not against Islam. But Sharia is notorious for leaving women possession-less, even of their own properties, after their relationship ends.

They better sort this out real quick.

Why Would Uganda Want an Anti-Gay Law?

The issues of LGBTs have always made the front pages of newspapers and the headlines of television news networks. It is not because they are sellable, but they are the “major” type of minority in the world, a symbol of its oppression. Most people will view them and compare the treatment to them as of blacks during the slavery years of the western world. But then again, they are also human, and they deserve all the right to live in harmony and protected by law.

It may leave some to question why Uganda and other countries, including those with insurgents and rebellion, want to have a law that would restrict gays and lesbians from becoming a part of society in an official manner. Today, Uganda’s LGBT’s community is rejoicing because a law proposed by the Ugandan government itself the Ugandan laws have overturned.

LGBTs in Uganda had hidden away from the view of authorities and even their own “straight” colleagues because of the possible punishment that they can be jailed for life. The law was implemented for six months until the Ugandan courts have rejected the law on August 1.

The law imprisoned one for being gay.

There are many possible explanations as to why Uganda, and extremist groups want to abolish the appearance of LGBTs.

One is that it destroys tradition. Most extremists and fundamentalists are against western ideals and teachings because it destroys their respective identities.

The second part is that it is not part of a religious teaching. Islamist fighters and jihadists have stressed out this fact against the gays and lesbians in their community, whom they treat less than human in many instances.