Sunday 16 November 2014

Californian Civil Courts Rule That Minors Could Make Sexual Decisions



Young people in California become increasingly at risk of danger from sexual predators because some civil courts rule that minors could make decisions about who they could have sexual intercourse with.



In 2010, a 28-year old middle-school math teacher began a six-month sexual relationship with a 14-year old female at his school. The teacher was convicted with charges of committing lewd acts with a child. 

During the hearing, it was found she lied to her mother so she could have sexual intercourse with her teacher. They went into a hotel and admitted she engaged in voluntary consensual sex. According to LA Unified Attorney Keith Wyatt, the girl is seen to be conscious of what she is about to do.

In California, 18 years old is the age of consent. Despite the threshold, a number of civil cases have said minors could consent to sexual activities.

Despite Attorney Wyatt ensuring that LA Unified had no negligence in the case, the jury found the school’s administration not at fault. The decision is still under appeal. 

However, other states in United States, according to Indiana University Professor of Law Jennifer Drobac, have diverted from the criminal law treatment of adolescent and juvenile consent.